Title & Reference

ANTONIO VIVALDI
Sonate per violino, e basso per il cembalo
Opus 2. Venezia, 1709
GCD 921202

buy at diverdi.com

Performer

ENRICO GATTI, violin

ENSEMBLE AURORA
Gaetano Nasillo, cello
Monica Pustilnik, archlute
Guido Morini, harpsichord

Production details

Total playing time: 71’34
Recorded in Langhirano, Italy, in June 2005
Engineered and produced by Manuel Mohino
Executive producer: Carlos Céster

Booklet essays

Booklet essay by Enrico Gatti

English, French, Spanish, Italian, German

Full-price digipak

Bar code

8 424562 21202 2

Antonio Vivaldi (1678-1741)
Sonate per violino, e basso per il cembalo (opus 2)
Venezia, 1709

1-4 Sonata II

5-8 Sonata III

9-12 Sonata IV

13-15 Sonata VII

16-19 Sonata I

20-23 Sonata IX

24-26 Sonata V

 

Complete CD Booklet
PDF (407K)

Commercial Release Sheet including artist's portrait
PDF (750K)

Despite the numerous opinions published on the works of the “young” Vivaldi (the author was actually alrdeay 30 years old when this collection came out), pointing out the Red Priest’s obvious debt to Corelli, a serious analysis of the first collections, ops. 1 and 2, clearly reveals the profound originality of the Venetian violinist. Their language is clear and transparent, as well as extremely elegant and measured.

Enrico Gatti: “Amongst the important characteristics of music are its fortuitous and ephemeral essence, the sudden loss of memory when the performance is over, and the perfume of its origin. And herein lies the artist’s responsibility, when he becomes the composer’s ‘interpreter’, when he tries to translate the composer’s language, based on signs, instead of simply assuming the role of spokesperson of himself (or for his own hysterical fury, his own thirst for fame and money). The music of Venice is not that lean, dry, sharp music that the sound of recent years has accustomed us to: it would be simplistic to see it solely as 18th-century rock music based on a highly rhythmical structure, in these times where there are no speed linits, imaginations run wild and all kinds of provocation are permitted. (...) The artist’s responsibility therefore consists in furnishing contemporary society with a plausible image –as close to reality as possible – of that distant society in its decline, for its beauty and appeal lie in its mystery, and it contains the same melancholy and brilliance as paintings from the same period...”